10 Lines on Article 35A Of Indian Constitution in English

Article 35A, a constitutional provision added in 1954, grants special privileges to permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. Its controversial origins and legal challenges underscore broader debates on regional autonomy and national integration in India.

Here, we’ve presented multiple samples of 10 lines on “Article 35A Of Indian Constitution”. All the samples will be helpful for students of all classes i.e. Nursery, LKG, UKG, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & class 12.

10 Lines on Article 35A Of Indian Constitution: Sample 1

1. Article 35A of the Indian Constitution grants special privileges to the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir.
2. It empowers the state legislature to define who these permanent residents are and what rights and privileges they possess.
3. This provision was added through a presidential order in 1954, bypassing the usual amendment procedure.
4. Article 35A allows the state to make laws regarding the ownership of property and employment rights for its residents.
5. It has been a subject of controversy, with some arguing that it discriminates against non-permanent residents.
6. The provision has been challenged in various courts, including the Supreme Court of India.
7. Critics argue that it hampers the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of India.
8. Supporters, however, view it as a safeguard for the unique identity and autonomy of the region.
9. The debate surrounding Article 35A has significant political and legal implications.
10. Its future remains uncertain, pending further judicial or legislative action.

Article 35A Of Indian Constitution 10 Lines: Sample 2

1. Article 35A of the Indian Constitution was inserted to provide special rights and privileges to the residents of Jammu and Kashmir.
2. It allows the state legislature to define “permanent residents” and grant them exclusive rights over land, employment, and government scholarships.
3. This provision was introduced through a presidential order in 1954, bypassing the regular amendment process.
4. Article 35A has faced criticism for perpetuating a sense of separatism and hindering the region’s full integration with the rest of India.
5. It has been a contentious issue, with debates over its constitutional validity and implications.
6. Opponents argue that it violates the principle of equality enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
7. Proponents, however, argue that it is essential for preserving the unique identity and autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir.
8. Over the years, Article 35A has been challenged in various courts, including the Supreme Court of India.
9. The outcome of these legal challenges remains crucial for the future of this constitutional provision.
10. The ongoing debate surrounding Article 35A reflects broader tensions between regional autonomy and national integration in India.

10 Lines About Article 35A Of Indian Constitution: Sample 3

1. Article 35A of the Indian Constitution, introduced in 1954 via a presidential order, bestows special privileges upon the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir, affording them exclusive rights over land ownership, employment opportunities, and access to government benefits.
2. Through this provision, the state legislature is empowered to define who qualifies as a “permanent resident,” thus shaping the socio-economic landscape of the region.
3. The insertion of Article 35A has sparked contentious debates, with critics arguing that it perpetuates a sense of separatism and undermines the principles of equality and national unity enshrined in the Constitution.
4. Conversely, supporters contend that it serves as a vital mechanism for preserving the distinct identity and autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir within the Indian Union.
5. Despite its intended objectives, Article 35A has faced legal challenges, including petitions questioning its constitutionality and compatibility with the broader framework of Indian law.
6. The Supreme Court of India has been tasked with adjudicating on these matters, grappling with complex legal arguments and historical precedents to arrive at a conclusive decision.
7. The outcome of these legal deliberations holds significant implications not only for the residents of Jammu and Kashmir but also for the broader discourse on federalism, minority rights, and constitutional interpretation in India.
8. Beyond its legal ramifications, the fate of Article 35A is intricately linked to the geopolitical landscape of the region, with potential ramifications for peace and stability in the volatile region of Jammu and Kashmir.
9. As such, the ongoing debate surrounding Article 35A underscores the delicate balance between preserving regional autonomy and promoting national integration within the Indian polity.
10. Ultimately, the resolution of this contentious issue will shape the future trajectory of governance, citizenship, and identity politics in the diverse tapestry of India’s federal democracy.

5 Lines on Article 35A Of Indian Constitution

1. Article 35A, a provision added to the Indian Constitution in 1954, grants special privileges to permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir.
2. These privileges include exclusive rights over land ownership, government employment, and educational scholarships.
3. The provision has been subject to legal challenges, with debates revolving around its constitutionality and implications for national unity.
4. Supporters argue that it safeguards the unique identity and autonomy of Jammu and Kashmir within the Indian Union.
5. However, critics contend that it perpetuates separatist sentiments and undermines the principles of equality enshrined in the Constitution.

20 Lines on Article 35A Of Indian Constitution

1. Article 35A, an insertion into the Indian Constitution in 1954, stands as a pivotal yet controversial provision granting special privileges exclusively to the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir.
2. Unlike other parts of India, where citizenship is determined by the Constitution, in Jammu and Kashmir, the state legislature has the authority to define who qualifies as a permanent resident.
3. This unique provision extends to permanent residents rights over property ownership, government employment, and access to various government benefits and educational scholarships.
4. What sets Article 35A apart is its origin—a presidential order issued under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, bypassing the regular amendment procedure.
5. Over the years, Article 35A has been subject to intense scrutiny and legal challenges, particularly regarding its constitutional validity and the manner in which it was enacted.
6. Critics argue that it perpetuates a sense of regional separatism, creating a dichotomy between the rights of permanent residents and those of non-residents.
7. On the other hand, supporters view it as a safeguard for the distinct cultural and demographic identity of Jammu and Kashmir.
8. The provision has been instrumental in shaping the socio-political landscape of the region, influencing everything from land ownership patterns to electoral dynamics.
9. Despite its significance, Article 35A remains a contentious issue, with debates often reflecting broader tensions between regional autonomy and national integration.
10. Interestingly, while Article 35A grants certain privileges to permanent residents, it also imposes restrictions on individuals who are not recognized as permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir.
11. This has led to debates over the fairness and inclusivity of the provision, particularly concerning the rights of women married to non-permanent residents and their descendants.
12. Moreover, the legal status of Article 35A has been further complicated by the revocation of Article 370 in August 2019, which stripped Jammu and Kashmir of its special status.
13. The subsequent abrogation of Article 35A by the Indian government has sparked renewed debates over its relevance and enforceability.
14. In the midst of these debates, the Supreme Court of India has been called upon to adjudicate on the constitutionality and legality of Article 35A.
15. The court’s verdict is eagerly awaited, as it holds the potential to shape the future trajectory of governance and identity politics in Jammu and Kashmir.
16. Furthermore, the fate of Article 35A has broader implications for India’s federal structure, minority rights, and the principle of equality before the law.
17. As the legal and political discourse surrounding Article 35A continues to evolve, it underscores the complexities inherent in managing diversity within a pluralistic democracy like India.
18. Beyond its legal ramifications, the provision has profound socio-economic implications, influencing patterns of migration, investment, and social cohesion in Jammu and Kashmir.
19. Ultimately, the resolution of the Article 35A debate will require a delicate balance between respecting regional aspirations and upholding the principles of constitutional democracy.
20. Whether Article 35A remains a cornerstone of Jammu and Kashmir’s unique identity or undergoes significant reform will shape the future trajectory of the region and its relationship with the Indian Union.